[isf-wifidog] Clarification about multiple gateways

[Marc Delisle]

Geneviève Bastien a écrit :
>   Hi,
> 
> Indeed the ID of the network interface was added to the name of  the 
> firewall rules, but quite recently.  1.1.4 did not have this feature.  
> I'd suggest the latest svn or latest release which is 20090925 whose 
> sources and some packages you can find at 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/wifidog/

Merci Geneviève, I'll try that.
> 
> Geneviève
> 
> On 11-09-14 11:09 AM, acv wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Marc Delisle wrote:
>>> Thanks Alex,
>>> our situation is that we need to add an address block for our numerous 
>>> clients and due to another constraint, we cannot change the addressing 
>>> scheme which is currently using a /24.
>>>
>>> If I understand you correctly, Wifidog (I'm using version 1.1.4) does 
>>> not expect to create the appropriate iptables rules for two instances?
>> As of the current version in SVN (I don't remember if it's 1.1.4) the firewall
>> tables have an ID value in their names so multiple instances can run. I just
>> referred to rules like the captive portal mangle rules, I think as long as
>> it's a different network interface (i.e.: eth0 and eth1) then it shouldn't
>> have any conflicts.
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WiFiDog mailing list
>> WiFiDog at listes.ilesansfil.org
>> http://listes.ilesansfil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wifidog
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WiFiDog mailing list
> WiFiDog at listes.ilesansfil.org
> http://listes.ilesansfil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wifidog