[isf-wifidog] Another authentication method?
Michael Way
michael.j.way at gmail.com
Ven 4 Avr 09:15:00 EDT 2008
I have tried setting the grace time to zero, which works as advertised.
The problem is that the email sent to the sponsor contains a very long URL link
that, essentially, must be copied and pasted into the new users
browser requiring
the sponsor to authenticate and enter the URL for them. I would like
something simpler where
there is a shorter alphanumeric code that could be printed off and
typed in by the user
w/o the sponsor having to log in themselves.
Sorry if I didn't make myself clear. Thanks for the suggestion though.
cheers,
mike
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Robin Jones <Robin at networkfusion.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> You can set the validation grace time period, so technically, setting it to zero would give you your desired result. but I have not tried this!
>
> Robin Jones
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: wifidog-bounces at listes.ilesansfil.org on behalf of Michael Way
> Sent: Fri 4/4/2008 12:48 AM
> To: wifidog at listes.ilesansfil.org
> Subject: [isf-wifidog] Another authentication method?
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi, Currently, as I have my authentication server setup
> (AuthenticatorUserLocal),
> the potential user must create an account while they are temporarily connected
> to the internet. They receive an email link that allows them long-term
> access to the
> internet once they click on the link. However I don't want to allow
> even 1 second of access to the internet by the potential user.
>
> I have a situation where I will have visitors on my network, but the
> email authentication would
> be sent to their sponsors email accounts. Instead of sending a longish URL link
> I would like to have an authentication token in the form of a
> short(ish) alpha-numeric string that the visitor could
> authenticate with once the sponsor receives it (and prints/writes it
> down for them). This would prevent
> unwanted people from using my network for even 1 second (a requirement).
>
> Does such an authentication mechanism exist, but perhaps I'm unaware of it?
> Would it be possible for me to modify a particular script or two to make such
> functionality possible?
>
> Thank You!
> mike
> _______________________________________________
> WiFiDog mailing list
> WiFiDog at listes.ilesansfil.org
> http://listes.ilesansfil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wifidog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WiFiDog mailing list
> WiFiDog at listes.ilesansfil.org
> http://listes.ilesansfil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wifidog
>
Plus d'informations sur la liste de diffusion WiFiDog