[isf-wifidog] Clarification about multiple gateways

[acv]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Marc Delisle wrote:
> 
> Thanks Alex,
> our situation is that we need to add an address block for our numerous 
> clients and due to another constraint, we cannot change the addressing 
> scheme which is currently using a /24.
> 
> If I understand you correctly, Wifidog (I'm using version 1.1.4) does 
> not expect to create the appropriate iptables rules for two instances?

As of the current version in SVN (I don't remember if it's 1.1.4) the firewall
tables have an ID value in their names so multiple instances can run. I just
referred to rules like the captive portal mangle rules, I think as long as
it's a different network interface (i.e.: eth0 and eth1) then it shouldn't
have any conflicts.

Alexandre
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pièce jointe autre que texte a été nettoyée...
Nom: non disponible
Type: application/pgp-signature
Taille: 195 octets
Desc: non disponible
URL: <http://listes.ilesansfil.org/pipermail/wifidog/attachments/20110914/3588295a/attachment.pgp>