[isf-wifidog] gateway and auth-server on the same machine

[Antonio Anselmi]

10.0.0.254       is the IP on the wlan  - external interface (eth0 in my 
machine)
192.168.1.111 is the IP on DMZ - gateway interface (eth1 in my machine)
192.168.1.1     is the IP of default gateway in DMZ (...outgoing interface 
of PIX)

Apache is listening on 192.168.1.111:80 (the same machine acts as a gateway 
and auth-server!)

...so I think this is correct:
ExternalInterface eth0

GatewayInterface eth1

GatewayAddress 192.168.1.1

AuthServer {
Hostname 192.168.1.111
 Path /
}

...or not ?

ciao

Antonio

N.B.

exists some wifidog rpm for FC5 and EL4 (CentOS-4.3)



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Max Horváth" <max.horvath at freenet.de>
To: "WiFiDog Captive Portal" <wifidog at listes.ilesansfil.org>
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: [isf-wifidog] gateway and auth-server on the same machine


> Of course you can, as long as you're having 2 Nics / IPs ...
>
> Cheers, Max
>
> Antonio Anselmi wrote:
>
>> Ok Greg thaks for your opinion: I'll rember it on setting up the
>> system (but maybe FC5 is not so stable as an Enterprise distro as
>> CentOS/RHEL 4).
>>
>> However,  my basic question remain:
>> can I configure and run the gateway and the server on the same
>> machine ?
>>
>> --
>> Antonio
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: <listserv.traffic at sloop.net>
>> To: "WiFiDog Captive Portal" <wifidog at listes.ilesansfil.org>
>> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 6:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: [isf-wifidog] gateway and auth-server on the same machine
>>
>>
>>> I'm sure you'll get lots of opinion from others more qualified than
>>> I...
>>>
>>> However, IMO, CentOS is a bad choice unless you're not at all taken
>>> back by compiling from source stuff like PHP5.
>>>
>>> I tend to want to use a good distro because I *DON'T* have to compile
>>> stuff myself often. If I do have to compile a bunch of stuff, then
>>> I'm
>>> not getting the benefit of the distro.
>>>
>>> I'm not done yet, getting my WifiDog up and running, but I think FC5
>>> has a lot more of the stuff built in and install-able via YUM
>>> repositories.
>>>
>>> So, the short of it is, I think FC5 is a better start. If you don't
>>> mind a bunch of compiling, then perhaps CentOS is fine.
>>>
>>> -Greg
>>>
>>> ---
>>>> Hi, a greeting to all the list from Italy !
>>>> I'm looking for a light system to manage clients coming from wlan
>>>> and
>>>> appreciate vaery much the wifidog ...but I have a basic question
>>>> in order to
>>>> save money for small wifi-comunity: can i run the gateway and the
>>>> auth-server on the same linux box ? we think to use a CentOS 4.3
>>>> distro,
>>>> running on Intel Petntium 4 machine.
>>>> Many thanks to all answers.
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Antonio
>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> WiFiDog mailing list
>>>> WiFiDog at listes.ilesansfil.org
>>>> http://listes.ilesansfil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wifidog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ----------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WiFiDog mailing list
>> WiFiDog at listes.ilesansfil.org
>> http://listes.ilesansfil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wifidog
>> _______________________________________________
>> WiFiDog mailing list
>> WiFiDog at listes.ilesansfil.org
>> http://listes.ilesansfil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wifidog
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
WiFiDog mailing list
WiFiDog at listes.ilesansfil.org
http://listes.ilesansfil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wifidog