[isf-wifidog] Suggestion for our TRAC setup ...
Max Horváth
max.horvath at maxspot.de
Mer 8 Mar 18:51:44 EST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
sure it is ... but what i like about the severity is blocker for
example.
so we could actually freeze a release until a blocker has been
resolved whereby a ticket with high priority (wanted feature) could
be moved to another milestone ...
anyway ... it works as it is right now ... it's just been a
suggestion ...
cheers, i'll go to bed now ;) ...
Am 09.03.2006 um 00:16 schrieb Benoit Grégoire:
> On March 8, 2006 05:48 pm, Max Horváth wrote:
>> - gpg control packet
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'd suggest that we add a "severity" flag to the tickets on TRAC like
>> the folks over at OpenWrt do ...
>>
>> So they have: enhancement, trivial, minor, normal, major, critical
>> and blocker ...
>>
>> This would be very useful now and later, when talking about the
>> release date of a WiFiDog version ...
>
> Since we work by milestone, I think having milestone, priority and
> severity at
> the same time would be confusing without clear guidelines. Severe
> bugs
> should get high priority anyway. But what is the severity of a
> RFE or a
> task?
>
> I think it's clearer the way it is now, where everything has a
> priority.
> --
> Benoit Grégoire, http://benoitg.coeus.ca/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFED24R+BKgC+eQ3ooRAgT2AJ99M8kVUmeGaBaD+a3APwNkRAEQBACfQVw1
mgWNOM9Hn0/DgCFu+s+4zrA=
=cPYi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the WiFiDog
mailing list