[isf-wifidog] Suggestion for our TRAC setup ...

Max Horváth max.horvath at maxspot.de
Mer 8 Mar 18:51:44 EST 2006

Hash: SHA1

sure it is ... but what i like about the severity is blocker for  

so we could actually freeze a release until a blocker has been  
resolved whereby a ticket with high priority (wanted feature) could  
be moved to another milestone ...

anyway ... it works as it is right now ... it's just been a  
suggestion ...

cheers, i'll go to bed now ;) ...

Am 09.03.2006 um 00:16 schrieb Benoit Grégoire:

> On March 8, 2006 05:48 pm, Max Horváth wrote:
>> - gpg control packet
>> Hi folks,
>> I'd suggest that we add a "severity" flag to the tickets on TRAC like
>> the folks over at OpenWrt do ...
>> So they have: enhancement, trivial, minor, normal, major, critical
>> and blocker ...
>> This would be very useful now and later, when talking about the
>> release date of a WiFiDog version ...
> Since we work by milestone, I think having milestone, priority and  
> severity at
> the same time would be confusing without clear guidelines.  Severe  
> bugs
> should get high priority anyway.  But what is the severity of a  
> RFE  or a
> task?
> I think it's clearer the way it is now, where everything has a  
> priority.
> -- 
> Benoit Grégoire, http://benoitg.coeus.ca/

Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)


More information about the WiFiDog mailing list