[isf-wifidog] Suggestion for our TRAC setup ...

[Benoit Grégoire]

On March 8, 2006 05:48 pm, Max Horváth wrote:
> - gpg control packet
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd suggest that we add a "severity" flag to the tickets on TRAC like
> the folks over at OpenWrt do ...
>
> So they have: enhancement, trivial, minor, normal, major, critical
> and blocker ...
>
> This would be very useful now and later, when talking about the
> release date of a WiFiDog version ...

Since we work by milestone, I think having milestone, priority and severity at 
the same time would be confusing without clear guidelines.  Severe bugs 
should get high priority anyway.  But what is the severity of a RFE  or a 
task?

I think it's clearer the way it is now, where everything has a priority.
-- 
Benoit Grégoire, http://benoitg.coeus.ca/
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pièce jointe non texte a été nettoyée...
Nom: non disponible
Type: application/pgp-signature
Taille: 189 octets
Desc: non disponible
Url: http://listes.ilesansfil.org/pipermail/wifidog/attachments/20060308/337c5af0/attachment.pgp