[isf-wifidog] Wifidog components naming + Redirection

[Jay Smith]

isf at plec.ca wrote:
> After reading your comments, I'm waiting for your suggestions :-)
>
> I stick with GuardDog (not WifiGuardDog): To me, the gateway's job is to
> let you enter (or give you access) or not. For Mina's comment: it's
> already in the suite name. Keeping Wifi in every component names is a good
> idea, but can mix people who are new to the "wifidog suite".
>
>   Pascal
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WiFiDog mailing list
> WiFiDog at listes.ilesansfil.org
> http://listes.ilesansfil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wifidog
>
>
>   
In many ways simple is better, why not wifidog Client, wifidog Server, 
wifidog Gateway, etc.

Just my .02 worth.

Jay Smith