[isf-wifidog] Uh oh! We apologize ...

[Philippe April]

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:02:27AM -0500, Mina Naguib wrote:
> I can think of 2 fixes:
> 
> 1. Make the external interface a mandatory config option again
> 2. (my recommendation) Run the built-in web server on a port other than
> port 80.  That way the rule will not interfere with it.  This would also
> be a mandatory requirement if we ever implement captive DNS
> 
> As always, everyone's thoughts are always welcome.

If I had the choice, I wouldn't go for any of the solutions :)

#1 scares me. I think it's a pretty good thing that we don't
need this parameter anymore.

So I vote #2, unless we can find another way to do it. I LOVE to have
the web interface on 80. Plus, it's openwrt's default.

I'll think about it, see if I can find any other solution.

-- 
Philippe April
GnuPG: http://key.philippeapril.com/
Skype ID: mousetrap