[isf-wifidog] Gateway NAT Patch

[Scott Tully]

> If we incorporate the patch and decide to attack this technically, where
> do we stop ? There are many issues to consider such as bad iptables
> rules, missing ip forwarding in the kernel or turned off in the sysctl,
> bridging setup etcetera.

True, you may not want to start down this path... 

> 
> I'm wondering if creating a better installation doc would be a lot more
> beneficial than addressing this one spot in the software.  The doc could
> mention that before running wifidog your setup needs to run seamlessly
> first, including masquerading, forwarding, firewalling et cetera (along
> with examples).

In addition to any README or INSTALL documentation, a nice big comment
in wifidog.conf about NAT would do the trick.

> 
> Either way, we really appreciate your adoption of the software and work
> on it.  IMO I say let this issue float around the list for a bit to give
> other subscribers the chance to think of PROs and CONs.
> 

NO problem.  I stand to learn allot from you guys.  I'll do what i can
to help the cause.

Scott