[Wifidog] Version 1.0
saruman at northernhacking.org
Thu Apr 22 18:33:16 EDT 2004
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 09:49:36AM -0400, Benoit Grégoire wrote:
> What I did say is that for version 1.0 we can cheat a little: after the
> account is locked out, instead of returning the result: YES,
> NEW_ACCOUNT_LOCKED and having the gateway decide what to do with it, we can
> just return NO, NEW_ACCOUNT_LOCKED.
> A note about YES/NO: In my opinion, yes means that authentication was
> successfull, not necessary that the user must be granted internet access.
> The user classes should have a well documented meaning, and the gateway
> should take final decisions based on them.
This was the essence of my original idea and the main reason behind
the code as it stands. I'd rather have the AP download UserClass definitions
from the Auth Server then have the Auth Server make decisions.
Wifidog mailing list
Wifidog at isf.waglo.com
More information about the Wifidog