[Wifidog] libhttpd

Fri Apr 2 11:15:05 EST 2004

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:14:01AM -0500, Mina Naguib wrote:
> 
> We'll have to implement some sanity so as not to fork() to death if 
> attacked, but I think the above takes care of our concurrency problem, 
> as well as stays on the simple side.
> 
> What are your thoughts on that ?

	I'm not sure how libhttpd will handle that. Conceptually, it's
good.

Alex

-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Wifidog mailing list
Wifidog at isf.waglo.com
http://isf.waglo.com/mailman/listinfo/wifidog_isf.waglo.com